G.Kaliyamoorthy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer,
W.P.(MD)No.12249 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.09.2020
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12249 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD)No.10513 of 2020 G.Kaliyamoorthy ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District.
2.The Tahsildar, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District.
3.Pattu 4.Mariammal 5.Malar 6.Maheswari ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records from the office of the 2nd respondent and quash the impugned notice issued by the 2nd respondent vide Na.Ka.No.4327/2020 A6 dated 03.09.2020. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Satheesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Rajarajan, Additional Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2.
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first and second respondents. Considering the nature of relief to be granted in this writ petition, notice to the private respondents is dispensed with.
2.What is under challenge is the notice issued by the Tahsildar, Kumbakonam, calling upon the parties concerned to attend the peace meeting. It is this notice that is impeached. I have consistently taken the view that such peace meetings convened by the revenue authorities are intended to amicably resolve the issues. As such, they are welcome measures. But they do not have any statutory https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.(MD)No.12249 of 2020 force as such. In other words, the decisions taken in such peace meeting cannot be legally enforced. They cannot be binding on the parties concerned. Therefore, challenge to the impugned notice is not really maintainable.
3.With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) ias Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:- 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District.
2.The Tahsildar, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District.
+1 CC to M/s.S. SATHEESH KUMAR, Advocate ( SR-17756[F] dated 22/09/2020 ) +1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-17882[F] dated 23/09/2020 ) W.P.(MD)No.12249 of 2020 22.09.2020 SCR(CO) AP(29/09/2020) 2 P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2