← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10595/2022ordered

Sheh Mohideen @ Sheik Mydeen v. The Inspector Of Police

2022-06-15Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 15/06/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.10595 of 2022 Sheh Mohideen @ Sheik Mydeen ... Petitioner/Accused No.4 Vs State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Tirunelvelli Town Police Station, Tirunelveli, (Crime No.125 of 2022).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Sathya Chidambaram S, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.125 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/accused No.4, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324, 307 and 506(ii) IPC, in Cr.No.125 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that there is a civil dispute between the parties, due to which, the petitioner and other accused trespassed into the de-facto complainant's land and illegally constructed the house. When the same was questioned by the de-facto complainant, A1 attacked the de-facto complainant with iron rod and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the counter case in

Crime No.126 of 2022 is pending against the de-facto complainant and party and hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the injured was discharged from the hospital and that the petitioner is having no previous case. 5.Considering the fact that there existed civil dispute between the parties and also the facts that the injured was discharged from the hospital, that except the offences under Sections 307 and 506 (ii) IPC, all other offences are bailable in nature and that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, but with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.IV, Tirunelveli, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/-(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

Sd/- 15/06/2022 / TRUE COPY / 21/06/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.II) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

sji

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.IV, TIRUNELVELI.

2. -DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUNELVELLI TOWN POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10595 of 2022 Date :15/06/2022 SP/VR/SAR II/21/06/2022/3P/5C