← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12014/2022disposed of

Hotel Chitra Private Ltd v. The Director

2022-06-24Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

WP(MD) No.12014 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 24.06.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN WP(MD) No.12014 of 2022 Hotel Chitra Private Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, T.Pari Vallal ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Director, Town and Country Planning, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Floor, E&C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai.

2.The District Collector cum Chairman of the Trichirappalli Local Planing Authority, Trichirappalli.

3.The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning/Member Secretary, Trichirappalli Local Planing Authority, Kajamalai Main Road, Kajamalai, Trichirappalli - 620 023.

4.The Commissioner, Trichy Corporation, Trichy.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent herein in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.4654/2021/Thi.Maa-3 dated 28.03.2022 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant approval for converting the petitioner private company land having an extent of 5306.078 sq.ft for residential/commercial use which is included in Trichirappalli Corporation Bypass Road Detailed Development Plan No.1 and the comprehensive variation map No.5, within the period that may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Malaiyendran For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.R.Baskaran, Standing Counsel for R4

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

WP(MD) No.12014 of 2022 2.The petition mentioned lands were originally included in the Trichirappalli Corporation Bypass Road Detailed Development Plan No.1. Later, they were once again included in the Comprehensive Variation Map No.5 published on 16.05.2001. No consequential steps for acquisition were taken up within the next three years. Seeking declaration that they stood released and that the original proceedings itself stood lapsed, the petitioner filed WP(MD)No.12134 of 2022. I allowed the said writ petition. It is seen that the petitioner's application for change of user was rejected. Since no consequential proceedings have been taken, the proceedings are deemed to have lapsed and the land itself stood released from such reservation, the reason mentioned in the impugned order is not sustainable.

The third respondent is directed to consider the petition mentioned application on merits and in accordance with law and pass final order after hearing the petitioner in person within a period of ten weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The writ petition stands allowed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // /07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) skm To 1.The Director, Town and Country Planning, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Floor, E&C Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai.

2.The District Collector cum Chairman of the Trichirappalli Local Planing Authority, Trichirappalli.

3.The Deputy Director of Town and Country Planning/Member Secretary, Trichirappalli Local Planing Authority, Kajamalai Main Road, Kajamalai, Trichirappalli - 620 023.

4.The Commissioner, Trichy Corporation, Trichy. +1 CC to M/s.V. MALAYENDRAN, Advocate ( SR-28155[F] dated 27/06/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-28482[F] dated 28/06/2022 ) WP(MD) No.12014 of 2022 24.06.2022 SS/07/07/2022/ 2P 7C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2