Chinna Raja v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Seventh day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.14549 of 2018 CHINNA RAJA ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI CITY.

(CRIME NO.31/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.NIRANJAN.S.KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : Mr.P.M.VISHNUVARTHANAN Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner herein is shown as A2 in Crime No.31 of 2018 on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 406, 417 and 420 IPC.

2.The petitioner moved this Court on two earlier occasions, seeking the very same relief. This Court declined to grant anticipatory bail. There is no change in circumstance. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner, however argued that the petitioner is also a victim on circumstances. According to him, he paid a certain amount to the first accused Vijayasekar, who had https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ procured the goods in question, fraudulently to the defacto complainant.

4.This Court is of the view that this is a matter for investigation. Therefore, the question of granting anticipatory bail does not arise.

5.Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. sd/- 27/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

PNN TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI CITY.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.P.M.VISHNUVARTHANAN Advocate SR.No.16346 PS/JC/SAR-2:04/09/2018:2P/4C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14549 of 2018 Date :27/08/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/