← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12005/2025disposed of

Muniyasamy M v. The District Collector

2025-04-25Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY M.Muniyasamy

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Assistant Directorate, Water Resource Department, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

4.Yuvaa Aqua Plasto, No.2/114, Kottanatham, R.R.Nagar Road, Virudhunagar District - 626 204.

...Respondents

PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 3rd respondents stop to get the ground water nearby Agricultural land made by 4th 1/5

respondent water company namely Yuva Aqua Plasto Company situated at Pattampudur Village, Virudhunagar Taluk and District by considering the petitioner representation dated 05.02.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Beema Rao For R1 to R3 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) By consent, this writ petition is taken up for admission at the admission stage itself.

2.Mr.P.Thilak Kuamar, learned Government Pleader, takes notice for the respondents 1 to 3. Considering the nature of the order proposed to be passed in this writ petition, notice to the fourth respondent is dispensed with. 3.The grievance of the petitioner is that his representation dated 05.02.2025 seeking stop getting the ground water nearby the agricultural land by the fourth respondent water company in the subject premises, has not been considered so far. Therefore, he has filed this Writ Petition. 2/5

4.The learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the official respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law within a period that may be stipulated by this Court.

5.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim made by the petitioner either in the representation or in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.02.2025 by giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve [12] weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. (J.N.B.,J.) (S.S.Y.,J.) 25.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ta 3/5

To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

2.The Assistant Directorate, Water Resource Department, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

4/5

J. NISHA BANU,J.

and S.SRIMATHY.J ta 25.04.2025 5/5