Duraisamy A v. The District Revenue Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN A.Duraisamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar, Naththam Taluk, Dindigul District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to transfer the patta in respect of the petitioner's property comprised in S.Nos.133/12 133/13, 133/18, 335/1G, 130/2N, 130/2R, 130/2H, 129/1C, 130/1A, 358/1, 353/12 situated at Settur Village, Naththam Taluk, Dindigul District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 14.06.2022 within the time stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Vishnu For Respondents : Mr.G.Sivaraja, Government Advocate.

1/4

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner seeks transfer of patta in respect of the petition mentioned lands.

3.The learned Government Advocate has given an elaborate report along with materials stating that the petitioner's request is not feasible of compliance. According to the learned Government Advocate, the petitioner is trying to take advantage of the similarity of name of his father along with others. Be that as it may, the second respondent is directed to pass order on the petition mentioned representation within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and intimate the same to the petitioner. 4.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 29.06.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 2/4

To:

1.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar, Naththam Taluk, Dindigul District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 29.06.2022 4/4