Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12502/2025disposed of

Shantha Poomani v. The Superintendent Of Police,

2025-04-29Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Shantha Poomani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police,

2. The Deputy-Superintendent Of Police, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

3. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Thoothukudi District.

4. The Inspector of Police Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell,

5. The Inspector of Police, Kayathar Police Station,

6. The Sub-Registrar, Kayatharu,

7. Valliammal

8. Muthukrishnan

9. Mahalakshmi 1/6

10. Shenbagaraj

11. Seeniyammal

12. Krishnaveni

13. Saravanan

14. Jayalakshmi

15. Maragatha Valli

16. Mareeshwari

17. Mahalakshmi

18. Suriya Pramman

19. Aandi

20. L. Santha Rani ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 to conduct proper enquiry upon petitioner representation dated 09.04.2025 and take appropriate action against the respondent no.6 to 19 in accordance with law within a stipulated time period.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Senthil Murugan For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi (R1-R5) Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar (R6) Government Advocate 2/6

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to conduct proper enquiry upon petitioner representation dated 09.04.2025 and take appropriate action.

2.According to the petitioner, due to property dispute, she sent a representation dated 09.04.2025 before the respondent police, but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the petitioner's representation is under consideration with the third respondent and they will conduct enquiry and take appropriate action, in accordance with law. 4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondents, is inclined to pass orders.

3/6

5.Recording the said submission that the petitioner's representation is pending with the third respondent, this Court directs the third respondent to conduct enquiry upon the petitioner's representation dated 09.04.2025 and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of fifteen days, from the date of this order, after affording opportunity to both the parties.

6.With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To

1. The Superintendent of Police,

2. The Deputy-Superintendent Of Police, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

3. The Inspector of Police, DCB, Thoothukudi District.

4. The Inspector of Police Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell,

5. The Inspector of Police, 4/6

Kayathar Police Station,

6. The Sub-Registrar, Kayatharu, 7.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P.DHANABAL , J.

PNM ORDER IN 29.04.2025 6/6