Sathish Kannan, v. The Chief Engineer/ Personnel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 05.09.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Sathish Kannan ... Petitioner Vs The Chief Engineer / Personnel, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation, TANGEDCO, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai-2

...Respondent

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to publish selection list along with the marks and category of the selected candidates in pursuant to the recruitment of Assistant Engineer vide Notification No.1/2018, dated 14.02.2018.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Ms.M.Parameswari

O R D E R

The Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the respondent to publish selection list along with the marks and category of the selected candidates in pursuant to the recruitment of Assistant Engineer vide Notification No.1/2018, dated 14.02.2018.

1/3

2. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, subsequently, the respondent has published the list as desired by the petitioner online and as a matter of fact, the petitioner has challenged the selection by way of W.P.(MD).No.5739 of 2017 and the petitioner succeeded. Aggrieved, the respondent filed W.A.(MD).No.886 of 2020, which was allowed and the petitioner has now filed Review Application in Rev.Aplc.(MD).No.150 of 2021 and the same is pending.

3. In that view of the matter, the prayer in the present writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to raise all the grounds available to him in the pending Review Application. No costs. 05.09.2023 NCC:yes/no Index:yes/no Internet:yes/no tsg 2/3

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.

tsg 05.09.2023 3/3