← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12672/2025closed

M.Pandisekar v. The Commissioner Of Police

2025-04-29Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL M.Pandisekar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, H8, Police Station, Nagamalaipudukkottai Police Station, Madurai.

3. Keerthikaran ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents no.1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent based upon the C.S.R.No.573 of 2024 dated 26.09.2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent. For Petitioner : Mr. M.Sridharan For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) Page No. 1 of 4

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents no.1 and 2 to take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent based upon the C.S.R.No.573 of 2024 dated 26.09.2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent.

2. According to the petitioner, he lodged complaint against the 3rd respondent and based on the same, the respondent police issued C.S.R.No. 573 of 2024 , but no action was taken so far. Hence this petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that already the petitioner's complaint in C.S.R.No.573 of 2024 was considered and closed after enquiry. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this case.

4. Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the 3rd respondent inclined to pass order in this petition.

Page No. 2 of 4

5. Since the petitioner's complaint was already considered and closed, nothing survives for further adjudication in this case. Therefore, it is for the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner know to law, if he is aggrieved over the closure of the complaint. In view of the same, preserving the liberty of the petitioner to challenge the closure of the complaint in the manner known to law, this writ petition is closed. 29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Mac To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, H8, Police Station, Nagamalaipudukkottai Police Station, Madurai.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 3 of 4

P.DHANABAL, J.

Mac 29.04.2025 Page No. 4 of 4