M.Sahul Hameed v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.06.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI M.Sahul Hameed ... Petitioner versus

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2. State through the Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to complete investigation of the case in FIR No.67/2024 on the file of the 2nd respondent within a stipulated time and to submit final report, within the period stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Atham Ali For Respondents : Mr.E.Antony Sahaya Prabahar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

ORDER

For the occurrence said to have taken place on 18.02.2024, the petitioner has preferred a complaint after five days, i.e. on 23.02.2024. Now, the petitioner has approached this Court that the respondent Police has not conducted the investigation and also sought for a direction to the respondents Police to file final report within a reasonable time.

2. Considering the conduct of the petitioner in lodging the complaint, for the incident said to have taken place, after five days and faulting with the respondent Police that they have not filed the final report within the statutory period, this Criminal original Petition is dismissed with cost of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees one thousand only), which has to be paid by the petitioner to the Kalaignar Centenary Library. 06.06.2024 NCC : Yes / No.

Index : Yes / No.

Internet: Yes / No.

ogy 2/4

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Paramakudi Town Police Station, Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy 06.06.2024 4/4