R.Jeyaprabhu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 23/09/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). No.10173 of 2020 R.Jeyaprabhu ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Cumbum South Police Station, Theni District.

(Cr.No.773 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.D.Selvam for Mr.S.Muthukumar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Ms.S.E.Veronica Vincent Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For an Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.773 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as A1, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 341, 294(b), 506(ii) and 120(b) of I.P.C., in Crime No.773 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous motive, on 10.02.2020 the petitioner and other accused persons have way laid the defacto complainant and also made life threat to him. Hence, a complaint.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted

that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail. 5.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the petitioner and other accused persons have involved a murder case based on a complaint given by the defacto complainant, dated 06.03.2020. He further submitted that the co-accused was already enlarged on bail in the murder case. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) and also considering the fact that the co-accused was already enlarged on bail in the murder case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalayam, Theni District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 23/09/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT.

2. DO THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CUMBUM SOUTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10173 of 2020 Date :23/09/2020 VSD TE/AKM/SAR-II : 25/09/2020 : 3P/5C