U.Manojkumar v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09.05.2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN CRL OP(MD)No.7524 of 2025 U.Manojkumar ... Petitioner Vs The State of TamilNadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tiruenlveli City.

(Crime No.55 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.I.Pinaygash For Respondent : Mr.K.Sanjay Gandhi Government Advocate(Crl.side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.55 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused No.1, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 447, 470, 471 and 420 of 1/5

IPC in Cr.No.55 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner and others have created forged document with regard to the property of the defacto complainant with an intention to grab that property. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner did not involve in any of the offences as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner is an innocent and he is falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. He further submits that the civil dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant is given a criminal colour and a civil suit is also pending before the competent civil Court. He therefore prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that without the permission of the land owner, the petitioner and others have encroached his property and when the defacto complainant/land owner asked to vacate the property, the petitioner and other persons demanded money from him. Hence, the defacto complainant lodged the complaint. Therefore, he prays to dismiss this Criminal Original Petition.

5. Considering the fact that the defacto complainant is the landlord and the petitioner is a tenant under lease and taking note of the fact that a civil suit in 2/5

O.s.No.203 of 2024 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Tirunelveli, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial 3/5

Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS 2023.

Sd/- 09/05/2025 // True Copy // / /2025 Sub Assistant Registrar (CS - I/II/III/IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai ta TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Tirunelveli.

2.Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tirunelveli.

3.The Inspector of Police, Perumalpuram Police Station, Tiruenlveli City.

4/5

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.I.PINAYGASH, Advocate ( SR-5480[I] dated 12/05/2025 ) ORDER IN CRL.OP(MD).No.7524 of 2025 Dated :

09.05.2025 BV(26/05/2025) 5P/ 6C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17.07.2023. 5/5