Mr.Jeyakumar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Tenth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.14205 of 2018 JEYAKUMAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

Crime No.101 of 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.M.ASOKAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) I.P.C in Crime No.101 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with his family members came to the lodge to book a room for attending the marriage function. Since there was a power failure, the petitioner vacated the lodge and asked to refund of the advance money. The defacto complainant refused to return the same. Subsequently, there was a wordy quarrel arose between them.

At that time, the petitioner along with his family members abused the defacto complainant and also assaulted him. Hence, the complaint. 3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sattankulam and on his executing a bond for a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 10/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SATTANKULAM.

2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTANKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.N.DILIP KUMAR Advocate SR.No.15344

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14205 of 2018 Date :10/08/2018 TK/PN/SAR.4/10.08.2018/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/