Madras High CourtWP(MD)/4399/2019dismissed as infructuous

B.Muthupandi, S/O.Bose, v. The Managing Director,

2025-06-26Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam,Honourable Dr.Justice A.D.Maria Clete4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and W.M.P(MD)Nos.3499, 3500, 3501 & 3502 of 2019 B.Muthupandi ... Petitioner in both cases Vs.

1. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), CMDA Complex, Egmore, Chennai 600 008.

2. The Regional Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Anna Nagar, Madurai 625 020.

3. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation (TASMAC), Madurai South, Sipcot, Kappaloor, Madurai District

...Respondents

in both cases 1/4

PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.4399 of 2019: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned proceeding in Rc.No.Q6/10999/2018 dated 21.02.2019 passed by the 1st respondent and the consequent impugned tender notification in Ve.Aa. No. 55/ Varaikalai/ 2019/ Se.Ma.Tho. A/ Madurai/ dated 21.02.2019 passed by the respondent No.3 published in Daily Thanthi Tamil Daily news paper dated 22.02.2019 quash the same as illegal. PRAYER in W.P(MD)No.4400 of 2019: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned proceeding in Rc.No.Q6/10999/2018 dated 21.02.

2019 passed by the 1st respondent and the consequent impugned tender notification in Ve.Aa. No. 55/ Varaikalai/ 2019/ Se.Ma.Tho. A/ Madurai/ dated 21.02.2019 passed by the respondent No.3 published in Daily Thanthi Tamil Daily news paper dated 22.02.2019 quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramsundar Vijayraj in both case for M/s.Veera Associates For Respondents : Mr.H.

COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the prayer sought for in these Writ Petitions has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

(S.M.S., J.) & (A.D.M.C., J.) 26.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No am 3/4

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

am 26.06.2025 4/4