Giridharan P v. The Inspector Of Police
W.P(MD)No.12343 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 20.06.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P(MD)No.12343 of 2022 P.Giridharan
...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Nagamalai Pudukottai, Madurai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur, Madurai District.
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2022 and grant permission to conduct State Level Minnoli Kabadi Tournament on 02.07.2022 and 03.07.2022 at about 9.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m at Vadivelkarai Village, Madurai District without causing any disturbance to public.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Manivannan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthikumar Government Advocate (crl.side)
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.06.2022 and grant permission to conduct State Level Minnoli Kabadi Tournament on 02.07.2022 and 03.07.2022 at about 9.00 p.m. to 6.00 a.m at Vadivelkarai Village, Madurai District.
2.Mr.M.Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that 'State Level Minnoli Kabadi Tournament ' tournament at Vadivelkarai Village, Madurai District is going to be held on 02.07.2022 and 03.07.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P(MD)No.12343 of 2022 conduct a tournament, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 02.06.2022. But the first respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief. 4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the first respondent has received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019 dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the first respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // /06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsd To 1.The Inspector of Police, Nagamalai Pudukottai Police Station, Nagamalai Pudukottai, Madurai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Samayanallur, Madurai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.C. MANIVANNAN, Advocate ( SR-26668[F] dated 20/06/2022 ) W.P(MD)No.12343 of 2022 MGJ(29.06.2022) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2