← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12387/2025disposed of

Mirthunjay Kumar v. The Director General Of Police

2025-04-29Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Mirthunjay Kumar ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police Dr.Radharkrishnansalai, Beach Road, Chennai 600 004.

2. The Inspector General of Police, Office of the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai 625 002.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Office of the Inspector General of Police Central Zone,

4. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police,

5. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police Theni District 625 531.

1/6

6. The Inspector of Police, Theni Cyber Crime Police Station, Theni District.

7. The Inspector of Police, Trichy Cyber Crime Police Station Trichy District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent 4 and 5 to take appropriate action on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 26.03.2025 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rameshkumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent 4 and 5 to take appropriate action on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 26.03.2025 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this court.

2/6

2.According to the petitioner, he sent the representation dated 26.03.2025 to the respondents 4 and 5, but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police denied the receipt of the petitioner's representation and he further submit that if the petitioner sends a fresh representation, they will conduct enquiry and take appropriate action, in accordance with law. 4.At this juncture, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner served a copy of the representation, dated 26.03.2025 to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

5.Since a copy of the representation is served to the respondents, recording the submission and today the respondents received the copy of the representation through the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) this Court directs the respondents 4 and 5 to conduct enquiry upon the petitioner's representation dated 26.03.2025 and take appropriate action, in accordance with law, within a period of one week, from the date of 3/6

this order, after affording opportunity to both the parties. 6.With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To

1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police Dr.Radharkrishnansalai, Beach Road, Chennai 600 004.

2. The Inspector General of Police, Office of the Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai 625 002.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Office of the Inspector General of Police Central Zone,

4. The Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, 4/6

5. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police Theni District 625 531.

6. The Inspector of Police, Theni Cyber Crime Police Station, Theni District.

7. The Inspector of Police, Trichy Cyber Crime Police Station Trichy District.

8.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

P.DHANABAL , J.

LR 29.04.2025 6/6