Kannan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Saturday, the Eleventh day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.14277 of 2018 1 KANNAN 2 SURESH ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED NO 2 & 3 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, JEMBUNATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

IN CRIME NO. 100 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506 (i) I.P.C, in Crime No.100 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant with stick. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners made a complaint before the respondent police against the defacto complainant. It is a case of case in counter. Further, he stated that the petitioners did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thuraiyur, Trichy District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 11/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

MSA TO THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THURRAIYUR, TRICHY DISTRICT.

THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE JEMBUNATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, TRICHY DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.A.JOEL PAUL ANTONY Advocate SR.No.15456 PS/JC/SAR-1:21/08/2018:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14277 of 2018 Date :11/08/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/