R.Ravichandran, v. The Regional Provident Fund

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY R.Ravichandran

...Petitioner

vs.

1.The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Regional Provident Fund Office, Lady Doak College Road, Madurai - 02.

2.The General Manager, Kaleesari Mills "B" Unit, P.O.Bag No.1, Kaliyar Kovil, Sivagangai District - 630 561.

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to act as per the Hon'ble Supreme Court's Order in Civil Appeal No(s) 10013-10014 of 2016 arising out of S.L.P.No.33032-33033 of 2015 and according to the circular No.1/12/33/EPS Amendment/96/Vol.II dated 23.03.2017 for revised pension to the petitioner.

For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondents :

Mr.K.Muralishankar for R1 Mr.V.O.S.Kalaiselvam for R2

O R D E R

There is no representation for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent would submit that the amount pertaining to the Provident Fund has already been settled by the first respondent to the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would also submit that, so far, whatever amount outstanding to the petitioner, has already been settled and therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.

4. The amount being settled might be the reason, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the writ petition.

5. In view of the same, recording the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. 14.11.2024 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY , J.

mbi 14.11.2024