← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/14407/2018allowed

Balamurugan v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-08-21Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.08.2018

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.[MD]No.14407 of 2018 1.Balamurugan 2.Singaravelan 3.Pandeswaran 4.Mariselvam : Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 4 Vs.

1. State rep by Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

(In Crime No.741 of 2017) : 1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Ganeshkumar : 2nd Respondent/Defacto complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to record the compromise reached between the petitioners/accused and the second respondent/defacto complainant and call for the records and quash the case in Crime No.741 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent.

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Kumara Velu For R-1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate[Crl. side] For R-2 : Mr.M.Joth Basu

ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.741 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent Police, for an alleged offences under Sections 153A, 292, 505(1)(c) IPC and Section 67A of Information Technology Act.

2. The case is still in the stage of investigation. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

3. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners and the second respondent and also by their respective counsel. The parties were also present before the Court and they were identified by Mr.Jothimuthu, SI of Police and they have also produced the copies of the Aadhaar Card which are made part of the record. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

4. Under such circumstances, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature. In the light of the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2017 9 SCC 641-(Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath), this Court in exercise of its jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashes the proceedings in Crime No.741 of 2017.

5. This Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and as a sequel, the proceedings in Crime No.741 of 2017, on the file of the first respondent Police, is quashed and the terms of Joint Compromise Memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Each of the petitioners shall pay a sum of Rs.250/- as costs, to the credit of the "Environment Fund" (payable in Account No.6656485009, Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Chennai), within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file a photocopy of the receipt along with a memo reporting compliance in the Registry.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Writs) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar (CS-II) Encl.: Xerox copy of Compromise Memo To

1. The Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3. Member Secretary, Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority, Madras High Court Campus, Chennai.

Copy To:- The Registrar (Judicial) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+ 1 CC TO M/s.G.M.LAW OFFICE, IN SR No. 79598 GNS TE/RSK/SAR-2 : 20/09/2018 : 3P/6C Crl.O.P.[MD]No.14407 of 2018 21.08.2018 (2/2)