← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12417/2025disposed of

Vijayan S v. The Regional Passport Officer

2025-04-29Honourable Mr.Justice Vivek Kumar Singh5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH S.Vijayan ... Petitioner -vs1.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Municipal Water Tank Building, W.B. Road, Tiruchirappalli - 620 008.

2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Pattukkottai, 3.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Pattukkottai, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to issue a passport in favour of the petitioner by considering his application in File No.TR1067429312125, dated 21.02.2025, based on the explanation/representation dated 19.03.2025, within a time limit stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pratheesh for M/s.Rityam Legal For R1 : Mr.B.Brijesh Kishore Central Government Standing Counsel For R2 and R3 : Mr.K.Gnanasekaran Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2. The petitioner seeks issuance of passport. He has submitted an application before the jurisdictional passport officer. Apprehending that it may not be processed in view of his involvement in a criminal case, the present writ petition came to be filed.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the second respondent submitted that a criminal case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.36 of 2024 for the offences under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C., on the file of the second respondent and the same has culminated in laying a final report through efiling [C-202500039] before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Pattukkottai,

4. In view of the above said submissions, the petitioner is given liberty to move the trial Court for the relief now sought for. As and when such miscellaneous petition is filed, it shall be numbered and disposed of within a period of three weeks thereafter. The learned trial Judge shall bear in mind that right to travel abroad is a fundamental right. The petitioner's career and avocation may be at stake, if he is denied the right to go abroad. Therefore, the trial Court unless there are extraordinary circumstances shall not deny the relief. Of course, the period of validity of passport will have to be restricted. It is also open to the learned trial Judge to stipulate appropriate conditions to ensure that the prosecution is not stalled on account of the petitioner's absence from India. If necessary, the applicant can be directed to file an application under Section 228 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by executing a special Vakalat.

5. Based on the order passed by the trial Court, the petitioner shall move the jurisdictional regional passport officer, who shall dispose of the petitionmentioned application in terms of the said order.

6. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

NCC : Yes / No 29.04.2025 Index : Yes / No smn2 To:- 1.The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Municipal Water Tank Building, W.B. Road, Tiruchirappalli - 620 008.

2.The Inspector of Police, Taluk Police Station, Pattukkottai, 3.The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Pattukkottai,

VIVEK KUMAR SINGH , J.

smn2 29.04.2025