K.Muthuraman Chettiar v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.07.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10896 of 2022 K.Muthuraman Chettiar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Police, C.O.P. Office, TVS Tollgate, Mannarpuram, Trichy - 20, Trichy District.

2.The Inspector of Police (Crime), Srirangam Police Station, Srirangam, Trichy - 6, Trichy District.

3.A.Asraff Ali ... Respondents (R-2 amended vide Court order dated 20.07.2022 in Crl.M.P.(MD).No.8158 of 2022 in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10896 of 2022).

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying this Court to direct the second respondent herein not to harass the petitioner in the light of his representation dated 22.04.2022. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For R-1 and R-2 : Mr.A.Albert James, Government Advocate, (Criminal Side).

ORDER

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking for a direction to direct the second respondent herein not to harass the petitioner in the light of his representation dated 22.04.2022.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner and his daughter entered into the business with the third respondent by investing the amount. After some period, the business faced severe loss. Hence, they forced to close the business. Thereafter, a dispute arose between the petitioner and the third respondent with regard to money transaction in the business. The third respondent illegally entered into the petitioner's house and threatened him with dire consequences by getting his signatures on some empty papers as well as documents. The complaints have been lodged by the petitioner as well as the third respondent against each other. The respondent Police repeatedly harassing the petitioner and his daughter. Being an old age, the petitioner 2/4

could not bear the tortures given by the respondent Police. Having no other way, the petitioner preferred a representation dated 22.04.2022 to the respondent Police not to harass the petitioner. Since no action was taken, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the third respondent gave a complaint against the petitioner's daughter with regard to money transaction. In this regard, the enquiry has been conducted and closed. As on date, no petition is pending against the petitioner.

4. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with a direction to the respondent Police to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.04.2022.

25.07.2022 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Nsr 3/4

V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

Nsr To 1.The Commissioner of Police, C.O.P. Office, TVS Tollgate, Mannarpuram, Trichy - 20, Trichy District.

2.The Inspector of Police (Crime), Srirangam Police Station, Srirangam, Trichy - 6, Trichy District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

25.07.2022 4/4