K. Banumathi, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fourteenth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.14462 of 2018 1 K. BANUMATHI 2 T. VALLIMAYIL 3 P. KANTHASAMY ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 to 3 Vs STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERIODU POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

CR.NO.261 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.A.CHANDRAKUMAR, Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners/A1 to A3 apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(i) of I.P.C. read with Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act, in Crime No.261 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, all the accused were said to have assaulted the defacto complainant and her mother by their hands and caused simple injuries and hence, the present complaint has been registered.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vedasanthur and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 14/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VEDASANTHUR, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERIODU POLICE STAION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to MR.A.CHANDRAKUMAR, Advocate SR.No.15541

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.14462 of 2018 Date :14/08/2018 PK/VR/SAR-4/21.08.2018 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/