Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7845/2025disposed of

Rani v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2025-04-28Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Rani ... Petitioner Vs

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Karur District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Kulithalai Sub-Division, Karur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thogaimalai Police Station, Karur District.

4. M.Palanisamy

5. Maruthaimuthu

6. Saravanan

7. Subramanian

8. Sivakumar ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original petition has been filed under Section 528 1/5

of BNSS to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to provide police protection to the life and limp of the petitioner and petitioner husband at the time of fencing the petitioner's property to an extent of 2 acres and 20 cents in Survey No.204/7B of Porunthalur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District based on the petitioner's representation, dated 31.03.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Lourdu Raj, For R1 to R3 : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to provide police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and her husband at the time of fencing the petitioner's property to an extent of 2 acres and 20 cents in Survey No.204/7B of Porunthalur Village, Kulithalai Taluk, Karur District based on the petitioner's representation, dated 31.03.2025. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned 2/5

Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that earlier, the petitioner's representation was already considered and closed on 11.03.2025. Again for the same relief, the petitioner sent the representation, dated 31.03.2025 and the same is under consideration. They will conduct enquiry and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law.

3.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondents, is inclined to pass order.

4.According to the petitioner, she sent the representation for police protection to fence the property as against the respondents 4 to 8 but the same has not been considered. The third respondent also admitted the receipt of the petitioner's representation and the same is pending. 5.Therefore, the third respondent is directed to conduct enquiry upon the petitioner's representation and take appropriate decision, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity to both the parties, within a period of fifteen days from the date of this order. 3/5

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

28.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Superintendent of Police, Karur District.

2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Kulithalai Sub-Division, Karur District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Thogaimalai Police Station, Karur District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL, J.

LR 28.04.2025 5/5