Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10328/2020dismissed

Kesavan v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-10-09Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

CRL OP(MD). No.10328 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 09/10/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD). No.10328 of 2020

1. Kesavan

2. Karthigaipandi

3. Palpandi ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.4 to 6 Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, Thisayanvilai Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(Crime No. 62 of 2020).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: Mr.C.Senthil Murugan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mrs.M.Anandha Devi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 62 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A4 to A6, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 380 of IPC, in Crime No.62 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 05.03.2020, some unknown persons had visited the defacto complainant's jewelry shop and stolen the gold ornaments worth about Rs.96,000/-. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the crime has been registered against the petitioner.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

CRL OP(MD). No.10328 of 2020 4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are arraigned as A4 to A6, based on the confession of the first accused. He further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the petitioners. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners are having one previous case.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioners are having one previous case of similar in nature, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. sd/- 09/10/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THISAYANVILAI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10328 of 2020 Date :09/10/2020 vsg AE/AKM/SAR-II (15.10.2020) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2