Madras High CourtWP(MD)/6566/2019dismissed

Krishnamoorthy @ S.J.Krishna v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2022-06-27Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.6566 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.6566 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)No.5256 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)No.3607 of 2021 Krishnamoorthy @ S.J.Krishna ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.

2.Kandasami Naidu ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of order e.f.vz;.6323/2017/m1 dated 25.09.2018 from the file of the first respondent to quash it and to direct the first respondent to conduct the case in the proper manner in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shanmuga Raja For R1 : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader For R2 : Mr.K.K.Kannan

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. The second respondent moved the jurisdictional Tahsildhar for effecting mutation of patta in his name. The jurisdictional Tahsildhar rejected the second respondent's request. Aggrieved by the same, the second respondent filed revision before the Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam also by the impugned order dated 25.09.2018 ordered that patta in respect of the petition mentioned land will stand only in the name of Kaliamman temple. In other words, the request of the second respondent was not accepted by the first respondent also.

3. The petitioner's counsel states that the petitioner is the hereditary dharmakartha of the temple in question.

4. I fail to understand as to how the petitioner can be aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Revenue Divisional https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.6566 of 2019 Officer. Of-course, the impugned order passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer has left the issue who is in the management of the temple open. In my view, she has rightly done so. No case for interference has been made out.

5. The writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CO) // True Copy // /07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi To The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.

+1 CC to M/s.K.K. KANNAN, Advocate ( SR-28277[F] dated 27/06/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-28717[F] dated 29/06/2022 ) W.P.(MD)No.6566 of 2019 27.06.2022 srk(CO) GC(05.07.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2