← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7890/2025allowed

A.Syed Mohamed Kasim @ Kasim v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2025-04-29Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.7890 of 2025

1. A.Syed Mohamed Kasim @ Kasim

2. B.Haji Ali Khan ... Petitioners Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Cr.No.71 of 2025.

2. J.Mohamed Kuthbudeen Meraj

3. S.Meharaj Banu

4. S.Sahubar Nisha ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records relating to FIR in Cr.No.71 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent police, for the alleged offences u/s.296(b), 115(2), 118(2), 329(4) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act dt 24.02.2025 against the petitioners and to Page No. 1 of 5

quash the same.

For petitioners :Mr. S.Atham Ali For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.M.Mohammed Abdul Fahad *****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Cr.No.71 of 2025 on the file of the first respondent police, for the alleged offences u/s.296(b), 115(2), 118(2), 329(4) of BNS and Section 4 of TNPHW Act dated 24.02.2025 and quash the same.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsels on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

3. The defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant Page No. 2 of 5

represented that they entered into a compromise and she has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated nil (filed on 28.04.2025) signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court.

4. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

5. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise along with counter case, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

6. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.71 of 2025 dated 24.02.2025 on the file of the first respondent police, is quashed as against these petitioners.

29.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd Page No. 3 of 5

To 1.The Inspector of Police R.S.Mangalam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.7890 of 2025 29.04.2025 Page No. 5 of 5