Chinnasamy v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Chinnasamy ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, The Office of Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The State Rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kallimandayam Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents take appropriate action on the petitioners representation dated 17.04.2025.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mani Anandh For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor 1/4

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents take appropriate action on the petitioner's representation dated 17.04.2025.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent police would submit that they have received the representation of the petitioner and the same was closed after conducting enquiry. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication.

3.Since the representation of the petitioner was already considered and closed by the respondent police and today, the copy of closure report also served to the petitioner, it is for the petitioner to challenge the closure report in the manner known to law. 2/4

4.In view of the above, this petition is closed by preserving the liberty of the petitioner to challenge the closure report in the manner known to law.

29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PNM To

1. The Superintendent of Police, The Office of Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kallimandayam Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

P.DHANABAL , J.

PNM ORDER IN 29.04.2025 4/4