K.Yogaraja, v. The State Rep.By

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 02.04.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN W.P.(MD)No.7767 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD)No.6176 of 2019 K.Yogaraja ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State represented by The District Collector, Trichirappalli.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, 4.The Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai.

5.The Commissioner, Municipality, Thuraiyur, 6.A.Durairaj 1/5

7.The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, 8.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.

...Respondents

[R9 is suo motu impleaded vide order dated 02.04.2019] PRAYER:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.02.2019 and evict the sixth respondent from the encroachment committed by him in S.F.No. 364/1, 365/1, 367/1, 367/8, 379/1, 442, 443, 444, 449, 450 & 456 all situate at Murugur in Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District and also in S.F.No. 361, 363, 367, 423, 424, 428, 436, 438, 440, 448, 327, 334, 336, 439, 365, 364, 376, 377, 444, 443 and 439 all situate at Murugur, Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District and S.F.No.365/1, 0.08.0 hectare and also the Varis in S.F.No.366/1, 367/5, 367/4, 367/9, 369/10, 367/11,368/2A, 368/2B, 368/2C, 363/7, 487/10, 354/7, 354/12, 354/13, 354/8, 361/2, 354/14, 342/1, 342/7, 341/10, 367/10, 367/11, 412/1 all situate in Murugur in Thuraiyur Taluk, Trichy District.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Singan No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.P.Maharajan (RR1 to 4 & 7 to 9) Special Government Pleader Mr.V.Meenakshisundaram (R6) Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi (R5) 2/5

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) Though notice has been served to the petitioner and his name is printed in the cause list, the petitioner has not chosen to appear before this Court either in person or through counsel. 2.Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

[N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 02.04.2026 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes ta To 1.The State represented by The District Collector, Trichirappalli.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Tahsildar, 3/5

4.The Director of Town and Country Planning, Chennai.

5.The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, 6.The Secretary, Public Works Department, Fort St.George, Chennai.

4/5

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

ta W.P.(MD)No.7767 of 2019 02.04.2026 5/5