S.Ramasamy Gounder v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.06.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.Ramasamy Gounder ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar (Revenue) Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Office at Kollapatti Village Panchayat, Ayylur Revenue Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

4.The District Revenue Officer, Dindigul.

(This Court suo motu impleaded R4 vide order dated 10.06.2024) ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to implement the order of the 1st respondent in Na.Ka. 25/2022/A2 dated 30.04.2022 within stipulated time.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For Respondents : Mr.G.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2. The petitioner states that during UDR, mistake had occurred regarding mutation of the revenue record in respect of the petition mentioned survey number. If that be so, the fourth respondent is the authority competent to make change. The petitioner is given liberty to move the fourth respondent. On receipt of the application, the fourth respondent shall pass an appropriate order on merits and in accordance with law after notice to all the interested parties within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.

3. With this liberty to the petitioner, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

10.06.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No rmi 2/4

To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Palani, Dindigul District.

2.The Tahsildar (Revenue) Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Office at Kollapatti Village Panchayat, Ayylur Revenue Village, Vedasandur Taluk, Dindigul District.

3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

rmi 10.06.2024 4/4