Palanisamy, v. The Inspector Of Police,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Eighth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP(MD) No.22232 of 2018 1 PALANISAMY 2 VENKATACHALAPATHY ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.K.NAGAR (CRIME) POLICE STATION, TRICHY.

Crime No.Not Known of 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.M.SURESH Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC., in Crime No. Not Known of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) appearing for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, petition enquiry has been conducted and subsequently, the same was closed. He has also produced a copy of the closure report.

3. Recording the above submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (crl.side), this Criminal Original Petition stands closed.

sd/- 08/01/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K.K.NAGAR (CRIME) POLICE STATION, TRICHY.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.M.SURESH Advocate SR.No.398

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.22232 of 2018 Date :08/01/2019 JM/VR/SAR 4/22.01.2019/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/