← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/12717/2022dismissed

Flt Lt (Retd) Dilip Kumar v. The Registrar

2022-06-23Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.12717 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.12717 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.9018 to 9020 of 2022 Dilip Kumar FLT LT (Retd.), S/o.Late Yogendra Prasad Mishra, Flat No.09, DDA MIG FlAT, Shri Keshav Kunj Appt., Sector - 17D, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110 075.

... Petitioner Vs.

The Registrar, Tamil Nadu National Law University, Tiruchirappalli - 620 027.

... Respondent Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the respondent made in Lr.No.A372-1/ REGR/Academic/TNNLU/2022 dated 04.06.2022 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to permit the petitioner's son Sundanshu Krishan (Registration No.BA0170048) to write the repeat examinations for the end semester exams. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Govindarajan, for Mr.R.Murali.

For Respondent : Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram, Standing counsel.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondent University.

2. The writ petitioner's son is a student of the respondent Law University. He has not been allowed to write the end semester examination. The student is said to be suffering from shortfall in attendance. As per the regulations made as modified by the Covid situation, the student must have 65% attendance in each subject and overall 70% attendance. The petitioner is below the said attendance percentage. Therefore, the respondent has passed the impugned order denying permission to the petitioner's son to write the end semester examination.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.12717 of 2022

3. In my view, the said order does not call for any interference. In the matters relating to attendance, unless the student has been prevented by the management from attending the class, Courts cannot interfere in the matter. However, it is clarified by the learned Standing counsel that the petitioner's son need not redo the semester but only to attend the clinical four classes which will be announced and thereafter he can write the supplementary end semester examination.

4. With the aforesaid clarification, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) // True Copy // /07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) PMU To:

The Registrar, Tamil Nadu National Law University, Tiruchirappalli - 620 027.

+1 CC to M/s.R. MURALI, Advocate ( SR-28017[F] dated 24/06/2022 ) +1 CC to M/s.D. NALLATHAMBI, Advocate (SR-28107[F] dated 24/06/2022) W.P.(MD)No.12717 of 2022 23.06.2022 NSN(CO) GC(01.07.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2