M.Rathinam,S/O.Muthusamy Naidu v. The Commissioner,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.12.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN M.Rathinam ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Corporation of Madurai, Aringnar Annamaligai, Madurai - 2.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Zone - 1, Corporation of Madurai, T.B. Road, Madurai.

3.The Assistant Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO, Arasarai, Madurai City, Madurai.

4.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Madurai City.

5.M.Kannan ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 4th Respondents to speedy disposal of the petitioner's representation dated 13.02.2019 within the stipulated time by this Court. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar For Respondents : Mrs.S.Devasena, Standing Counsel for R1 & R2.

Mr.S.Deenadhayalan, Standing Counsel for R3 & R4.

Mr.V.Sukumar for R5.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2.The petitioner and the fifth respondent are brothers. The petitioner is aggrieved by the name transfer. It appears that the electricity connection was standing in the name of Muthusamy Naidu, the father of the fifth respondent and the petitioner. The petitioner alleges that the fifth respondent surreptitiously and illegally changed the name in his favour. I do not want to go into the controversy for the present. It appears that partition suit is pending between the parties in O.S.No.37 of 2012 on the file of III Additional Sub Court, Maduri. The rights of the parties will abide by the final outcome of the partition suit proceedings. No direction needs to be issued. 2/4

3.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. 09.12.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No ias 3/4

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

ias 09.12.2022 4/4