Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10266/2021disposed of

Vinothkumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-09-29Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10266 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29.09.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10266 of 2021 Vinothkumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.Sundaresan 4.Saravanan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram for R1 & R2 Additional Public Prosecutor Mr.J.Madhu for R3

ORDER

(This petition is heard through video conference) This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2021. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that based upon the complaint given against the petitioner enquiry has been undertaken in CSR No.382 of 2021 and it was closed on 31.03.2021, directing the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10266 of 2021 parties to workout their remedy through proper civil proceedings. 3.The learned counsel for the third respondent submitted that this petitioner has purchased a vehicle by getting loan from a private finance company. In that loan the third respondent has given surety. Since the same was not refunded, the finance company announced the third respondent as a debtor. He has not obtained any loan for his own purpose.

4.It appears it is a dispute with regard to the payment of the due amount of vehicle. It is purely money transaction dispute between the parties. Hence, question of police protection may not arise. The third respondent has to workout his remedy through proper proceedings.

5.Therefore, nothing survives in this petition for further consideration and direction. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CRL) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) TM Note: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Inspector of Police, Musiri Police Station, Musiri, Trichy District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10266 of 2021 29.09.2021 RD(22.10.2021) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2