Daisyrani v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Daisyrani ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, The District Collector,

2. The Superintendent of Police,

3. The Tahsildhar,

4. The Executive Officer, Nilakottai Union,

5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Highways Department, Ammayanayakanur, Dindigul District 624 201.

6. The Inspector of Police, Nilakottai Police Station, Page No. 1 of 6

7. The President, The Devendra Kulavellalar Sangam, ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, direct the 3rd respondent to remove the name board illegally erected by 7th respondent in petitioner patta land in survey Nos.468/2A, 468/2B, 468/2C1A, 468/64, 468/2C1C situated at Nilakottai village, Dindigul District based on 4th respondent proceedings Na.Ka.No.62/2025/THA/A dated 05.03.2025 and petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 and consequently direct the 6th respondent to give police protection at the time of removing a name board by 3rd respondent herein, within a specific period as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Balaji For R1, R2 & R6 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) For R3 : Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the 3rd respondent to remove the name board illegally erected by 7th respondent in petitioner's patta land in survey nos.468/2A, 468/2B, 468/2C1A, 468/64, 468/2C1C situated at Nilakottai village, Dindigul District based on 4th respondent proceedings Na.Ka.No.62/2025/THA/A dated Page No. 2 of 6

05.03.2025 and petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 and consequently, to direct the 6th respondent to give police protection at the time of removing a name board by 3rd respondent herein.

2. According to the petitioner, she sent the representation dated 24.03.2025 to the official respondents for removing the name board erected by the 7th respondent in her patta land, but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent no.1, 2 and 6 would submit that the petitioner's representation is under consideration with the 3rd respondent.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the 3rd respondent would submit that the petitioner's representation is pending for enquiry.

5. Considering the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court without even issuing notice to the 7th respondent inclined to pass order in this petition.

Page No. 3 of 6

6. Since the representation of the petitioner is pending with the 3rd respondent, this Court directs the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.03.2025 and take appropriate action, in accordance with law after affording opportunity to both the parties, within a period of fifteen days from the date of this order.

7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. 29.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Mac Page No. 4 of 6

To

1. The District Collector,

2. The Superintendent of Police,

3. The Tahsildhar,

4. The Executive Officer, Nilakottai Union,

5. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Highways Department, Ammayanayakanur, Dindigul District 624 201.

6. The Inspector of Police, Nilakottai Police Station,

7. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 5 of 6

P.DHANABAL, J.

Mac 29.04.2025 Page No. 6 of 6