Ramu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/08/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI Ramu ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Erwadi Dharga - Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

Crime No.171 of 2021).

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balamurugan, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthilkumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No.171 of 2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/A3, who was arrested on 07.06.2021 for the offences punishable under Section 4(1)(A) of Tamil Nadu Prohibition Act in Crime No.171 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in illegal possession of 1000 litres of illicit palm toddy. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and a false case has been foisted against him. He would also submit that the petitioner is in jail from 07.06.2021, hence, he may be granted bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that investigation in this case is almost completed.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that investigation is 1/3

almost completed and also taking into consideration the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ramanathapuram District and on further condition that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

sd/- 02/08/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

2/3

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

3. THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT JAIL, RAMANATHAPURAM.

4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ERWADI DHARGA - POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/S.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate ( SR-4989[I] dated 02/08/2021 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10419 of 2021 Date :02/08/2021 OGY MS/VR/SAR-2/02.08.2021/3P.7C 3/3