← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/906/2020dismissed

K.Muruganand v. The Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation Limited,

2025-08-12Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar3 pages

1 W.A.(MD)NO.906 OF 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.08.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR W.A.(MD)No.906 of 2020 K.Muruganand ... Appellant / Writ petitioner Vs.

1. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Madurai Division, Byepass Road, Madurai - 625 016.

2. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Madurai Region, Byepass Road, Madurai - 625 016. ... Respondents / Respondents Prayer: Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.1760 of 2020 dated 12.03.2020.

For Appellant : Mr.S.Govindan For Respondents : Mr.J.Senthil Kumariah * * *

J U D G M E N T

Heard both sides.

1/3

2 W.A.(MD)NO.906 OF 2020

2. The appellant herein is a retired employee of the Transport Corporation. He filed W.P.(MD)No.15664 of 2016 for settling his terminal benefits. The writ petition was disposed of. Alleging that the order was not complied with, the appellant filed Cont.P.(MD)No.1830 of 2018.

3. It was not open to the appellant to file one more writ petition on the same cause of action. That is why, the learned single Judge dismissed the writ petition. The approach of the learned single Judge cannot be faulted. If the appellant feels aggrieved, his remedy is to file miscellaneous petition in the contempt petition seeking its revival.

4. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs.

(G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.) & (K.RAJASEKAR, J.) 12th August 2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No PMU 2/3

3 W.A.(MD)NO.906 OF 2020 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

AND K.RAJASEKAR, J.

PMU W.A.(MD)No.906 of 2020 12.08.2025 3/3