Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10356/2017disposed of

Sankar @ Jaisankar v. The District Collector

2017-06-09Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam,Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 09.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P.[MD].No.10356 of 2017 and W.M.P(MD).No.7935 of 2017 Sankar @ Jaisankar : Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dindigul District.

3.The Tahsildar, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

4.The Commissioner, Nilakkottai Panchayat Union, Nilakottai, Dindigul District.

5.The Block Development Officer [Village Panchayats], Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

6.The Revenue Inspector, Nilakottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

7.The Executive Officer, Ammayanayakkanur Town Panchayat, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District.

8.P.Krishnan : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari/Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order dated 22.05.2017 in Na.Ka.No.130/2017/A1 passed by the seventh respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Barathan For Mr.T.R.Jeyapalam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Respondent Nos.1 to7: Mr.T.S.Mohammed Mohideen Additional Government Pleader For Respondent No.8 : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar.

To 1.The District Collector, Dindigul District.