Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/19776/2018allowed

Chinnathambi, S/O.Shanmugam v. The Inspector Of Police,

2018-11-01Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19776 of 2018 1.Chinnathambi 2.Venkatesh 3.Dhivagar 4.Murali @ Murugan 5.Bharathi 6.Gobi 7.Mahesh 8.Rajesh 9.Ravichandiran @ Ranjith 10.Subramani 11.Jeyaraman 12.Rajendiran 13.Palanivel @ Mohan 14.Balasubramanian 15.Saravanan 16.Sundaramoorthy

...Petitioners/Accused 1 to 16

Vs.

1. The State represented by Inspector of Police, Ramjee Nagar Police Station, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District. ...1st Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.13 of 2018) 2.Murugan ...2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and quash the FIR in Crime No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Ramjee Nagar Police Station, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District, pursuant to the compromise arrived at between the parties.

For Petitioners : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar For R-1 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate, (Crl. Side) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ For R-2 : Mr.S.Vinayak

ORDER

This petition has been to quash the FIR in Crime No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Ramjee Nagar Police Station, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District, pursuant to the compromise arrived at between the parties. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up, the petitioners, the 2nd respondent, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent are present and they have filed a memo of compromise stating that they have compromised the matter and the de facto complainant do not want to pursue the matter against the petitioners and he has no objection to quash the proceedings against the petitioners. The compromise memo filed by the petitioners and second respondent/de facto complainant is recorded.

3.Considering the fact that they have compromised the matter and recording the compromise memo filed by the parties, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to quash the proceedings against the petitioners.

4.Accordingly, this criminal original petition is allowed and the proceedings in FIR in Crime No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Ramjee Nagar Police Station, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District, against the petitioners /A1 to A16 is hereby quashed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) Encl: Xerox copy of Joint Compromise Memo To

1. The Inspector of Police, Ramjee Nagar Police Station, Tiruchirappalli, Tiruchirappalli District.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar, Advocate Sr.No.94050 SM VB/RSK/SAR4/23.11.2018/2P/4C Crl.O.P(MD)No.19776 of 2018 01.11.2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/