Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1058/2017disposed of

M/S. Chengalvarayan Co-Op v. The Assistant Provident Fund

2017-01-23Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:23.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.1058 of 2017 M/s.Chengalvarayan Cooperative Suger Mills Limited, represented by its Managing Director, A.Selvaraj, Chengalvarayan Quarters, Chengalvarayan Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited, Periyaselvalai Post, Vilupuram District.

... Petitioner -vsThe Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, No.18, Madurai Road, Trichy-620 008.

...

Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in Ref.No.TN/SRO-TRY/PDC/C21/17211/7Q Proc/2016, dated 4.1.2017 passed by the respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the respondent to accept the remaining outstanding determined amount in the above impugned order in 24 equal instalments.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Mu.Muthu For Respondent : Mr.K.Murali Shankar *****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed, seeking to quash the impugned order dated 4.1.2017 passed by the respondent in Ref.No.TN/SROTRY/PDC/C--21/17211/7Q proceedings, in and by which, the respondent directed the petitioner to remit the outstanding determined amount within fifteen days. The petitioner also sought a direction to the respondent to accept remittance of the amount in 24 equal instalments.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner Mill is engaged in manufacturing of sugar, governed by the EPF Act and has been remitting the EPF contribution regularly; that due to sudden trough in the industry, the establishment suffered huge loss and was not able to repay any dues, pursuant to which, the respondent initiated proceedings under the provisions of the EPF Act, 1952 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

and passed the impugned order under Section 7Q of the Act. Therefore, the petitioner sought a direction to permit them to pay the amount in instalments.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4. Though the petitioner is willing to pay the entire amount together with interest, penalty, damages, etc. in 24 instalments, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as such. Therefore, the petitioner is directed to remit the entire amount, as demanded by the respondent in six instalments and the petitioner shall pay the 1st instalment on 10.02.2017 and the subsequent instalment shall be paid on or before 7th of every succeeding month without fail. It is made clear that if the petitioner fails to pay anyone of the instalments, the order impugned in this writ petition shall be restored and it is open to the respondent to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law without seeking any clarification from this Court.

5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, No.18, Madurai Road, Trichy-620 008.

+1cc to Mr.K.Muralisankar,Advocate Sr.No.3591 +1cc to Mr.K.Mu.Muthu,Advocate Sr.No.3741 W.P.(MD) No.1058 of 2017 23.01.2017 vsn um/mpa/sarIII/25.01.2017/2p/4c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/