Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10635/2017partly allowed

M.Manickam Nadar, v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-06-07Honourable Mr Justice N. Authinathan,Honourable Mr Justice A. Selvam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.10635 of 2017 M.Manickam Nadar .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vilathikulam Police Station, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the rejection order of the second respondent dated 30.05.2017 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to grant permission and protection for Adal Padal program in connection with Thiruvizha scheduled to be held on 05.07.2017 at Arulmigu Sri Pathirakaliamman Thirukovil at Sithavanaickenpatti, Vilathikulam Taluk, Thoothukudi District.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Karthic Rajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the rejection order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same, by way of issuing a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus.

2.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for conducting Adal Padal programme on 05.07.2017

and the same has been rejected by the second respondent simply on the ground of law and order problem. The reason assigned by the second respondent is not proper and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order.

4.In fine, this Writ Petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 30.05.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders within a period of two days.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(RTI) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registra To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vilathikulam Police Station, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District.

+1cc to SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER in SR. No.59077 +1cc to M/s. R.KARTHIC RAJAN Advocate in SR. No.58775 PS JS/SV.MMS/2P-5C/9.6.2017 ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.10635 of 2017 07.06.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/