R.Subbulakshmi, v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.SELVAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.AUTHINATHAN W.P(MD)No.10678 of 2017 R.Subbukalai .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to impugned letter passed by second respondent dated 05.06.2017 and quash the same and consequently directing the second respondent to grant permission to conduct the Aadal Paadal Kalai Nikalchi programme on 13.06.2017 night in respect of Sri Muthulamman, Mariamman, Bhagavathiamman Temple festival situated at S.Pudukottai, Nilakkottai Taluk, Dindigul District. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thangapandian For Respondents : Mr.M.Govindan, Special Government Pleader.

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by A.SELVAM, J.] This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to call for records relating to the order dated 05.06.2017 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and also for directing the respondents to give necessary permission for conducting Adalpadal Kalai Nikalchi programme in the place mentioned therein, by way of issuing a writ of certiorarified mandamus.

2.Mr.M.Govindan, learned Special Government Pleader, has taken notice for the respondents.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.It is seen from the records that the petitioner has given a representation for the purpose mentioned therein, but the second

respondent has rejected the same by way of passing the impugned order dated 05.06.2017, wherein it has been simply stated that due to law and order problem, permission cannot be granted. The reason assigned by the second respondent cannot be accepted and therefore this Court is inclined to pass the following order. 4.In fine, this writ petition is allowed in part without costs and the impugned order dated 05.06.2017 passed by the second respondent is quashed. The second respondent is directed to look into the representation alleged to have been given by the petitioner afresh and pass suitable orders on merits within a period of two days.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-II) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Sub Inspector of Police, Sempatti Police Station, Dindigul District.

+1cc to M/S.R.Thangapandian, Advocate SR.No. 59027 W.P(MD)No.10678 of 2017 08.06.2017 smn JM/JC/SAR 2/09.06.2017/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/