← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/13616/2021disposed of

Jeyanthi v. The District Collector

2021-08-06Honourable Mr Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Jeyanthi ... Petitioner versus

1. The District Collector,

2. The District Revenue Officer,

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District-625 533.

4. The Tahsildar, Uthamapalayam, Theni District-625 533.

... Respondents Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 25.03.2021 relating to issuance of joint patta in S.No.2496/2 situated at Pannaipuram Village, uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District measuring an extent of 2.07 Acres of punja land in the light of recommendation made by the fourth respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/587/2017 dated 24.12.2018.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran

ORDER

The petitioner seeks issuance of a joint patta in relation to the land bearing Survey No.2496/2 at Pannaipuram Village, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.

2. The petitioner states that the land in Survey No.2496/2 was purchased by the petitioner's father under a registered sale deed dated 20.09.1996. It is also stated that patta No.1848 was issued with regard to such property. The petitioner alleges that on account 1/3

of the confusion created in relation to an adjacent property, it appears that the revenue records in respect of this property have been mutated to reflect that it is assessed waste dry land. In these facts and circumstances, the petitioner made a representation and the petitioner relies upon the recommendation of the Thasildar on 24.12.2019 for issuance of patta in favour of the petitioner.

3. Mr.R.Baskaran, learned counsel for the State, accepts notice on behalf of all the respondents and submits that the representation may be considered and disposed of on merits.

4. Accordingly, without going into the merits of the matter, the third respondent herein is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.03.2021, by taking into account all material aspects, including the fourth respondent's recommendation dated 24.12.2019 and pass a reasoned order after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and anyone else who would be affected by such decision. Such reasoned order shall be passed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. W.P.(MD).No.13616 of 2021 is disposed of on these terms without any order as to costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Note:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The District Collector, 2/3

2.The District Revenue Officer, 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Uthamapalayam, Theni District-625 533.

4.The Tahsildar, Uthamapalayam, Theni District-625 533.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL GP ( SR-25637[F] dated 09/08/2021 ) 06.08.2021 GC (16/08/2021) 3P 6C 3/3