← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/18036/2018disposed of

T.Nagasundaram, v. The Chairman Of State

2018-08-16Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.08.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.(MD) No.18036 of 2018 T.Nagasundaram ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Chairman of State Transport Undertakings and the Additional Chief Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Managing Director, Corporation Office, By Pass Road,

3. The Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Office, By Pass Road,

4. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporations Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, SETC Limited, Tamil Nadu Office, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse and settle the petitioner's terminal benefits, Gratuity, Pension Commutation Value, Provident Fund Accumulation, Earned Leave Encashment and Contribution recovered for the IRT Medical, Engineering and Polytechnic College, due Rs.38,00,000/- within the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Gokul For Respondents : Mr.R.Sethuraman Special Government Pleader for R-1 Mr.A.Jeya Ram for RR-2 to 4

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to disburse and settle the

petitioner's terminal benefits, Gratuity, Pension Commutation Value, Provident Fund Accumulation, Earned Leave Encashment and Contribution recovered for the IRT Medical, Engineering and Polytechnic College, due Rs.38,00,000/- within the time frame fixed by this Court.

2.Mr.R.Sethuraman, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent. Mr.A.Jeyaram, learned Counsel takes notice for the respondents 2 to 4. By consent of both parties, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3.The case of the petitioner is that the Petitioner has already given representations to the respondents. But his representations did not evoke any response from the respondents. Hence, the present writ petition has been filed.

4. The learned counsel for the first respondent would submit that it is agreeable for the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass orders thereon. 5.In view of the submission, the first respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 05.07.2018 and to pass appropriate orders on the same in accordance with the rules, within a period of three months from the date on which a copy of this order is made ready.

6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (writs) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I) To

1. The Chairman of State Transport Undertakings and the Additional Chief Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.

2. The Managing Director, Corporation Office, By Pass Road,

3. The Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Office, By Pass Road,

4. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporations Employees Pension Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, SETC Limited, Tamil Nadu Office, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.

+1cc to SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.No.79110 Vs MK/RP/SAR 1/07.09.2018/3P/6C W.P.(MD) No.18036 of 2018 16.08.2018