Gnanasekar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of August Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice N.ANAND VENKATESH CRL OP(MD) No.15037 of 2018 GNANASEKAR ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALWARTHIRUNAGIRI POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO.71 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.S.GOKUL RAJ Advocate For Respondent : Mr.V.NEELAKANDAN, Additional Public Prosecutor. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 3 of TNPPDL Act and 379 (NHO) of IPC , in Crime No.71 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to wory quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant the case and counter case has been registered.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioners have damaged the house and taken away the articles belonging to the defacto complainant. He woudl further submit that the petitioner had given a previous complaint against the defacto complainant and the same was registered in crime number 70 of 2018 before the same respondent police and this complaint was given as a counter blast.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the defacto complainant and the petitioner are close relatives and case has been given by both parties against each other. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the with certain conditions.

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 24/08/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALWARTHIRUNAGIRI POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.S.GOKUL RAJ Advocate SR.No.16092 PS/VR/SAR-1:31/08/2018:2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.15037 of 2018 Date :24/08/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/