Madras High CourtWP(MD)/10850/2017disposed of

A.Rajathi v. The District Collector

2017-06-15Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.(MD)No.10850 of 2017 and WMP(MD)Nos.8267 and 8268 of 2017 A.Rajathi : Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Commissioner of Municipality, Devakottai Municipality, Municipal Office, Devakottai-630 302, Sivagangai District. : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Tender Notification proceedings in Na.Ka.No.1896/2010/A2, dated 29.05.2017 as published in Dhinathanthi Newspaper, dated 29.05.2017 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct afresh Tender by allowing the petitioner to patriciate in the same, within the time stipulated by this court. For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Vishuvarthanan For 1st Respondent : Mr.D.Muruganandham Additional Government Pleader For 2nd Respondent : Mr.Mohammed Imran

O R D E R

The writ petition is filed to call for the records of the impugned Tender notification, dated 29.05.2017 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to conduct a fresh tender by allowing the petitioner to participate in the same.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 2nd respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.Mr.Mohammed Imran, learned counsel for the 2nd respondent, on instructions, would submit that as per the original tender

notification, 14.06.2017 was fixed for submitting the tender forms, but it was postponed to 28.06.2017. The learned counsel would further submit that the petitioner can also submit her tender document to the 2nd respondent, which was considered along with other tenderers in accordance with law.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that since the 2nd respondent has agreed to receive the tender application of the petitioner, no further adjudication is necessary in this writ petition.

5.Recording the submissions made on either side, this writ petition is disposed of, as no further adjudication is necessary. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AD II) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Commissioner of Municipality, Devakottai Municipality, Municipal Office, Devakottai-630 302, Sivagangai District.

3.The Additional Government Pleader, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.H.Mohammed Imran,Advocate,SR.60663 +1cc to Mr.P.M.Vishnuvarthanan,Advocate,SR.60403 +1cc to M/S.Special Government Pleader,SR. 60545 W.P.(MD)No.10850 of 2017 15.06.2017 ER KK/ SVMMS /SAR 2 /21.06.2017/2P-7C/ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/