Chinnasamy .P v. The Superintendent Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 23.06.2022 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM W.P(MD)No.13005 of 2022 P. Chinnasamy
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli - 2.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thalaiyuthu, 2.The Inspector of Police, Gangai Kondan,
...Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and adequate police protection to conduct Kodai Festival scheduled in the invitation on 01.07.2022 in Arulmigu Chinnathambi Temple in Pallankulam, Gangaikondan Village, Tirunelveli District based on the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.06.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.C. Susikumar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar Government Advocate (crl.side)
O R D E R
This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant permission and adequate police protection to conduct Kodai Festival scheduled in the invitation on 01.07.2022 in Arulmigu Chinnathambi Temple in Pallankulam, Gangaikondan Village, Tirunelveli District based on the representation of the petitioner, dated 12.06.2022. 2.Mr.M. Sakthikumar, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.
1/3
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Festival for the temple, by name, Arulmigu Chinnathambi Temple in Pallankulam, Gangaikondan Village, Tirunelveli District is going to be held on 01.07.2022. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme, they sought permission of the police by giving a representation dated 12.06.2022. But the respondents have not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.
4.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the respondents have received the representation of the petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.
5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police.
6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019 along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the 3rd respondent police is hereby directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.06.2022 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular.
7. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) // True Copy // /06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) trp To
1. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli - 2.
2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thalaiyuthu, 2/3
3.The Inspector of Police, Gangai Kondan, 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.C. SUSIKUMAR, Advocate ( SR-27860[F] dated 24/06/2022 ) 23.06.2022 NSN(CO) KB(28.06.2022) 3P 6C 3/3