M.Murugan v. M.A.Murugesan
Cont.P.(MD)No.842 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Cont.P.(MD)No.842 of 2020 M.Murugan ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs.
1.Mr.M.A.Murugesan, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai - 625 016.
2.Mr.Rajeshwaran, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region, Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 016.
3.Ms.Bama, Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar Illam, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors/respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 04.11.2019 in W.P.(MD)No.22959 of 2019.
Prayer in WP(MD).22959/2019:
Writ Petition filed under the Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle interest for the belated payment of the petitioner's terminal benefits including Gratuity, Terminal Leave Salary, Commuted value of Pension and provident Fund from the date of the petitioner's retirement to till the date on which the said benefits were settled to him.
For Petitioner :
Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents :
Mr.J.Senthilkumaraiah, Standing Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
Cont.P.(MD)No.842 of 2020
ORDER
The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 04.11.2019, made in W.P.(MD)No.22959 of 2019.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents submitted that the order of this Court dated 04.11.2019, made in W.P.(MD)No.22959 of 2019, has been complied with.
3.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsm Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
Cont.P.(MD)No.842 of 2020 12.07.2021 MGJ(23.07.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2