Ganesh Pandian v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Second day of November Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.19920 of 2018 1 GANESH PANDIAN 2 DURAIPATHI BALA SUBASH 3 VINOTH KUMAR 4 BASKARAN ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED No. 1 to 4 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEITHUR RURAL POLICE STATION, SEITHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(IN CRIME NO. 166/2018) ... RESPONDENT No-1/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : MR.R.KARUNANIDHI Advocate For Respondent : MR.V.NEELAKANDAN, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 336, 506 (ii) of IPC and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damages and Loss) Act 1992, in Crime No.166 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that 09.10.2018. the petitioners have thrown stone on the tube lights during the Mariamman Temple festival celebration at Sundarrajapuram Village and abused the defacto complainant with filthy language. Hence, the complaint.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that the accused persons caused damages to the tube lights during the temple festival.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 02/11/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAJAPALAYAM 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SEITHUR RURAL POLICE STATION, SEITHUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to MR.R.KARUNANIDHI Advocate SR.No.21136

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.19920 of 2018 Date :02/11/2018 MSI/PN/SAR-II/12.11.2018-2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/