Rajendran.S v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 29.04.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR S.Rajendran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, 119, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Arulmighu Kallalagar Temple, Alagar Kovil, Madurai District.

... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 2nd respondent to settle the petitioner's monetary benefits for the period of 03.03.2016 to 28.02.2018 and gratuity arrears as per the fixation of 7th pay commission within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Bharathi For Respondents : Mr.P.Subbaraj, Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.S.Manohar for R2

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the relief sought in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and also made an endorsement to that effect. The same is also confirmed by the learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2

2. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 29.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes vsm

To 1.The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department, 119, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai.

2.The Deputy Commissioner, Arulmighu Kallalagar Temple, Alagar Kovil, Madurai District.

MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.

vsm 29.04.2025