← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8394/2024dismissed

Sampath v. The Inspector Of Police,

2024-06-28Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 28/06/2024 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI and CRL MP(MD). No.5918 of 2024

1. Sampath

2. Savitha ... Petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 Vs The Inspector of Police,, District Crime Branch, Theni Cr No.15 of 2024.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.Pooventhera Rajan.J, For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor For Intervenor : Mr.Meenakshi Sundaram, Senior Counsel for Mr.M.P.Senthil, Advocate PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory bail in Crime no. 15 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police.

1/4

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent Police, in connection with a case in Crime No.15 of 2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC, have filed this petition seeking anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant and the petitioners have entered inta a partnership agreement and establised BPCL Gas Agency at Theni. However, the petitioners have refused to pay the profit share to the defacto complainant. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the parties have not entered into any agreement. He further submits that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4.The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the intervenor submits that the defacto complainant has registered the agreement at the State of Kerala. 2/4

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent Police submits that initially there was an oral agreement between the parties. But after some time, the parties have registered the agreement, which has been entered between them.

6. Considering the stage of investigation and the nature of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. sd/- 28/06/2024 / TRUE COPY / /07/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

LR TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,, DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, THENI 2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.PNSSM.AMMAAR, Advocate ( SR-7150[I] dated 01/07/2024 ) 3/4

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8394 of 2024 Date :28/06/2024 SA/JGB/SAR. /10.07.2024/4P/4C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 4/4